ArticleLab on a chip2023
Bioelectronic microfluidic wound healing: a platform for investigating direct current stimulation of injured cell collectives.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- SCHEPHERD: A modular, programmable, direct current platform to control cell behavior.Science advances · 2026Article
- A Data Driven Review of In Vitro Electrical and Mechanical Stimulation for Post-Acute Phase Wound Healing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Engineering the Healing Process: Advanced In Vitro Wound Models and Technologies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Electrochemical modulation of host-microbe dynamics in wound healing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- SCHEPHERD: A universal platform for high-throughput, high-resolution, and programmable control of cell behavior through bioelectric stimulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Controlling Cell Migratory Patterns Under an Electric Field Regulated by a Neural Network-Based Feedback Controller.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Electrical Microneedles for Wound Treatment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Electroactive Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds: Innovative Approaches for Improved Skin Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Rationally Improved Surface Charge Density of Triboelectric Nanogenerator with TiOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Bioelectronic Direct Current Stimulation at the Transition Between Reversible and Irreversible Charge Transfer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Looking both ways: Electroactive biomaterials with bidirectional implications for dynamic cell-material crosstalk.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Resorbable conductive materials for optimally interfacing medical devices with the living.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Oral Galvanism Side Effects: Comparing Alloy Ions and Galvanic Current Effects on the Mucosa-like Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Electrotaxis evokes directional separation of co-cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upon cutaneous injury, the human body naturally forms an electric field (EF) that acts as a guidance cue for relevant cellular and tissue repair and reorganization. However, the direct current (DC) flow imparted by this EF can be impacted by a variety of diseases. This work delves into the impact of DC stimulation on both healthy and diabetic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.