Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36722659›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2023

Barriers to patient recruitment in a poststroke neurorehabilitation multicenter trial in Brazil.

T R da Silva, G J Luvizutto, L G Martins, R D M da Costa, J T de Souza, F C Winckler, L C A Sartor, G P Modolo, N C Ferreira, J C S Rodrigues and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

T R da SilvaDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-767X
G J LuvizuttoDepartamento de Fisioterapia Aplicada, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-7225
L G MartinsDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6223-3107
R D M da CostaDepartamento de Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5977-8146
J T de SouzaDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-7505
F C WincklerDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7299-5612
L C A SartorDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-1619
G P ModoloDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1057-5089
N C FerreiraDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2323-6310
J C S RodriguesDepartamento de Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-8744
R G KandaDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4663-5787
M O FogaroliDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4340-9389
G F BorgesDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6143-4249
G R S RizzattiDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6998-1500
P W RibeiroDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6731-7593
D S PiresHospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-3708
D B FavorettoDepartamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6853-1914
L R AguiarDepartamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-7422
S G Z BazanDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0607-8189
L E G BettingDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5680-2254
L C O AntunesDepartamento de Reabilitação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6422-6445
H R C NunesDepartamento de Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7806-1386
V M PereiraDepartment of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6804-3985
T G S EdwardsDepartamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3033-2981
O Pontes-NetoDepartamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0317-843X
A B ConfortoHospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7869-3490
R BazanDepartamento de Neurologia, Psicologia e Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-308X
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro · BRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a high demand for stroke rehabilitation in the Brazilian public health system, but most studies that have addressed rehabilitation for unilateral spatial neglect (USN) after stroke have been performed in high-income countries. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze USN patient recruitment in a multicenter noninvasive brain stimulation clinical trial performed in Brazil and to provide study design recommendations for future studies. We evaluated the reasons for exclusion of patients from a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial of rehabilitation of USN patients after stroke. Clinical and demographic variables were compared between the included and excluded patients. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Only 173 of the 1953 potential neglect patients (8.8%) passed the initial screening. After screening evaluation, 87/173 patients (50.3%) were excluded for clinical reasons. Cognitive impairment led to the exclusion of 21/87 patients (24.1%). Low socioeconomic status led to the exclusion of 37/173 patients (21.4%). Difficulty obtaining transportation to access treatment was the most common reason for their exclusion (16/37 patients, 43.3%). The analyzed Brazilian institutions have potential for conducting studies of USN. The recruitment of stroke survivors with USN was restricted by the study design and limited financial support. A history of cognitive impairment, intracranial stenting or craniectomy, and lack of transportation were the most common barriers to participating in a multicenter noninvasive brain stimulation trial among patients with USN after stroke.

Indexed as

Neurological RehabilitationStrokeStroke RehabilitationBrazilHumansPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID36722659
PMCPMC9883007
OpenAlexW4318475164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.