ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2023
Interaction of positive airway pressure mask magnets with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Connected to the cloud at time of death: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
- Recalling recalls: how do we interact with our patients.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesTo evaluate for potential interactions between magnetic positive airway pressure (mPAP) masks and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for patients with sleep apnea.
methodsAdult patients with a CIED who used an mPAP mask were recruited from our sleep clinic to undergo a safety visit at our pacemaker clinic. We tested whether the mPAP interacted with the implanted device at home during normal use and in the clinic during simulated normal use and with direct contact. The magnetic field strength of 6 mPAP masks was tested with a gaussmeter.
resultsOf 13 patients tested, 1 (8%), wearing a full face mask (ResMed AirFit F30 [ResMed, San Diego, California]), had a magnet response event (interaction) with direct contact, but no interactions were identified during normal or simulated normal use in any patient. The magnetic field strength of the mPAP masks increased the closer the mask got to the CIED, from 0.4 mT (4 G) at the mask manufacturer's recommended 5.1-cm (2-inch) distance from an implanted medical device up to 291 mT (2,910 G) at 0 cm (0 inches; direct contact).
conclusionsAn mPAP mask may interact with a CIED if placed directly on the skin overlying the CIED. The use of Philips Respironics (Philips, Cambridge, Massachusetts) mPAP masks is now contraindicated in patients with a CIED. Until additional studies are conducted to better document the risks and benefits of mPAP masks, we recommend discouraging patients with CIEDs from using any mPAP mask. CITATION: Ruoff CM, Tashman YS, Cheema KPK, et al. Interaction of positive airway pressure mask magnets with cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.