Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36722584›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia

Validation in Indonesia of two published scores for mortality prediction after cardiac surgery.

Yunita Widyastuti, Cindy E Boom, I Made A Parmana, Juni Kurniawaty, Akhmad Y Jufan, Dudy A Hanafy, Vibeke Videm

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yunita WidyastutiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Cindy E BoomDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta, Indonesia.
I Made A ParmanaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Juni KurniawatyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Akhmad Y JufanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Dudy A HanafyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Vibeke VidemDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Universitas Gadjah Mada · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: No mortality risk prediction model has previously been validated for cardiac surgery in Indonesia. This study aimed at validating the EuroSCORE II and Age Creatinine Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score as predictors for in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery a in tertiary center, and if necessary, to recalibrate the EuroSCORE II model to our population. Methods: This study was a single-center observational study from prospectively collected data on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery from January 2006 to December 2011 (n = 1833). EuroSCORE II and ACEF scores were calculated for all patients to predict in-hospital mortality. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval. Calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (HL test). Multivariable analysis was performed to recalibrate the EuroSCORE II; variables with P < 0.2 entered the final model. Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.8%, which was underestimated by the EuroSCORE II (2.1%) and the ACEF score (2.4%). EuroSCORE II (AUC 0.774 (0.714-0.834)) showed good discrimination, whereas the ACEF score (AUC 0.638 [0.561-0.718]) showed poor discrimination. The differences in AUC were significant (P = 0.002). Both scores were poorly calibrated (EuroSCORE II: HL test P < 0.001, ACEF score: HL test P < 0.001) and underestimated mortality in all risk groups. After recalibration, EuroSCORE II showed good discrimination (AUC 0.776 [0.714- 0.840]) and calibration (HL test P = 0.79). Conclusions: EuroSCORE II and the ACEF score were unsuitable for risk prediction of in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery in our center. Following recalibration, the calibration of the EuroSCORE II was greatly improved.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresAdultCalibrationCreatinineHospital MortalityHumansIndonesiaCreatinineACEF scorecardiac surgeryEuroSCORE IIin-hospital mortalityrecalibrationrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID36722584
PMCPMC9997462
OpenAlexW4318754048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.