Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36722537›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery

Graphical education and appropriate time before elective colonoscopy make better bowel preparation.

Jiachen Sun, Yongpeng Chen, Yuqin Gu, Junrong Chen, Chujun Li, Qiulun Zhou, Jiancong Hu, Guozhi Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiachen SunDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yongpeng ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yuqin GuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Junrong ChenDepartment of General Practice, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Chujun LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Qiulun ZhouSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Jiancong HuDepartment of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Guozhi JiangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inadequate bowel preparation leads to lower polyp detection rates, longer procedure times and lower cecal intubation rates. However, there is no consensus about high-quality bowel preparation, so our study evaluated graphical education and appropriate time before elective colonoscopy. Patients and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a national colorectal cancer screening programme of 738 patients. The patients were divided into a group given a graphical information manual (n = 242) or a word-only one (n = 496). They were also divided into groups according to the interval between bowel preparation and colonoscopy: 6-8 h (Group 1, n = 106), 9-12 h (Group 2, n = 228) and 13-17 h (Group 3, n = 402). All patients were scored according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) during the examination. Results: The bowel preparation of the graphical group was significantly better than the text group (P < 0.001). After adjustment, the bowel preparation score of Group 1 and Group 2 were both significantly higher than that of Group 3 (P = 0.012 and P = 0.032). Maximum BBPS was 6.31 when the interval time was 6.52 h (95% confidence interval: 5.95-6.66), and when the interval was <10 h, the BBPS was ≥6. Conclusion: High-quality bowel preparation was linked to graphical education and appropriate time before colonoscopy. We suggest that the interval between taking the first laxative and colonoscopy should be <10 h, preferably 6.5 h. Prospective multicentre research is needed to give more evidence of high-quality bowel preparation methods.

Indexed as

Bowel preparationcolonoscopyeducational methodsgraphic guidanceinterval time

Identifiers

PMID36722537
PMCPMC10034805
OpenAlexW4283780268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.