Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36722536›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimal access surgery

Intra- and post-operative outcomes in benign gynaecologic surgeries before and after the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: A comparison.

Rooma Sinha, Neeru Verma, Rupa Bana, Nivya Kalidindi, Sowmya Sampurna, Girija Shankar Mohanty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimal access surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SEX AND ASA CLASSIFICATION, NOT FASTING TIME, ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE LIKELIHOOD OF COMPLICATIONS IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rooma SinhaDepartment of Gynecology, Apollo Health City, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Neeru VermaDepartment of Gynecology, Apollo Health City, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Rupa BanaDepartment of Gynecology, Apollo Health City, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Nivya KalidindiDepartment of Gynecology, Apollo Health City, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sowmya SampurnaDepartment of Gynecology, Apollo Health City, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Girija Shankar MohantyDepartment of Gynecology, Apollo Health City, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Apollo Hospitals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare intra- and post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing benign gynaecologic surgery before and after the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. Introduction: ERAS is a multidisciplinary teamwork with the aim to reduce the body's reaction to surgical stress. The key components of ERAS include pre-operative counselling, avoiding prolonged fasting, standardised analgesic and anaesthetic regimes, early mobilisation and early discharge. Materials and Methods: Women undergoing hysterectomy and myomectomy were included in the study. The pre-ERAS group had 100 cases and the ERAS group had 104. Demographic data of both the groups were compared. Duration of surgery, amount of blood loss, intra-abdominal drain, oral feed, catheter removal, ambulation, passage of flatus and length of stay were compared. Results: The demographic profiles of both the groups were comparable. Time taken to intake of liquids (P < 0.001), solid food (P < 0.001), passage of flatus (P = 0.001), removal of Foley's catheter (P = 0.023), ambulation (P = 0.007), pain score (P = 0.001) and length of stay in hospital (P < 0.001) were statistically significantly shorter in the ERAS group when compared to the pre-ERAS group. A significant difference was seen in the use of intraperitoneal drains in the ERAS group (81% vs. 23.1%), and if used, drains were removed early in the ERAS group (66.66% vs. 28.39%) within 40 h. Both the groups had similar intra- and immediate post-operative complications. Conclusion: ERAS helps in reducing length of stay with early feeding and ambulation, leading to early discharge without increase in intra- and post-operative complications in women undergoing benign gynaecological surgeries.

Indexed as

Enhanced recovery after surgerygynaecologyhysterectomylaparoscopymyomectomysurgery

Identifiers

PMID36722536
PMCPMC10034813
OpenAlexW4313030901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.