Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36722381›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disabilities : JOID2024

Persevering professionals: dilemmas of relationships and self-determination in work with people with intellectual disability - a multi-method study based on interpersonal process recall.

Mari Husabø, Magne Mæhle, Målfrid Råheim, Aud Marie Øien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mari HusabøDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9551-448X
Magne MæhleDepartment of Welfare and Participation, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway.
Målfrid RåheimDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.
Aud Marie ØienDepartment of Welfare and Participation, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article focuses on social educators' reflections on their own professional practice in encounters with people with intellectual disability receiving services. Drawing on Interpersonal Process Recall, a video-assisted method, together with a focus group interview, the study explores the experiences from in-situ encounters of five social educators employed in a Norwegian municipality. The key findings are that they view relationship-building as integral to their work, they grant primacy to the ideal of autonomy and they strive towards realizing this in their daily work. The study however displays how these emphases might lead to dilemmas, especially between the wish to support the service users' self-determination and the urge to protect them from harm. Of special note was how the service users' increasing use of social media was perceived as a particular challenge for social educators, who were left with an experience of being unable to protect.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityPersonal AutonomyQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedNorwayProfessional-Patient RelationsSocial Workersinterpersonal process recallpeople with intellectual disabilityprofessional practicerelational workself-determination

Identifiers

PMID36722381
PMCPMC11059826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.