Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36722333›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2023

German general practitioners' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and how it affected their patient care: A qualitative study.

Lisa Makowski, Hanna Schrader, Sandra Parisi, Jana Ehlers-Mondorf, Stefanie Joos, Hanna Kaduszkiewicz, Ildikó Gágyor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa MakowskiDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Hanna SchraderDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Sandra ParisiDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Jana Ehlers-MondorfInstitute of General Practice, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Stefanie JoosInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Healthcare, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Hanna KaduszkiewiczInstitute of General Practice, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Ildikó GágyorDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEKiel University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) play a significant role in providing medical care to patients affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Little is known about the impact of the pandemic on patient care from the perspective of GPs.

objectivesTo gain insight into GPs' experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on patient care in Germany.

methodsFrom August to December 2020, qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 22 GPs from four randomly selected federal states in Germany. We analysed the data according to Kuckartz's method of content analysis.

resultsFive themes emerged: changes in healthcare system, practice routines, patient care, personal life, and improving health crisis preparedness. Communication with authorities and following rapidly changing guidelines were the biggest challenges during the pandemic. Teamwork and collegial exchange in the practice were seen as important sources of support to overcome these barriers. Participants stated that they managed to secure care but expressed concerns about how social distancing might affect the doctor-patient relationship. In their professional and private lives, GPs perceived themselves as role models with a high responsibility for the health of others. Consistent guidance by health authorities and reliable information were raised as necessary for managing patient care in the pandemic.

conclusionFindings show that patient care was successful but GPs' adaptation to unprecedented conditions was limited by poor communication and collaboration with health authorities. Therefore, providing adequate support services by policymakers is essential to strengthen primary care in future health crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansPandemicsPatient CarePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchCOVID-19 pandemicdoctor-patient-relationshipgeneral practicequalitative studyteam cohesion

Identifiers

PMID36722333
PMCPMC10249445
OpenAlexW4318754071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.