ArticleJournal of genetics2023
Diagnosis of prenatal 22q11.2 duplication syndrome: a two-case study.
Article in Journal of genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to perform the prenatal diagnosis of two foetuses with 22q11.2 duplication for 2.5 Mb after noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), and to explore the prenatal diagnosis and genetic characteristics of these foetuses. After amniocentesis, each foetus was diagnosed through karyotype analysis and single-nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array), and copy number variation using shotgun sequencing (CNV-seq) was carried out on each mother's peripheral blood for comparative analysis. Both pregnant woman 1 and pregnant woman 2 had foetal amniotic fluid chromosomal karyotypes of 46, XN. The SNP-array result for foetus 1 was arr[hg19] 22q11.21(18,648,856-21,800,471) x3; namely, 22q11.2 had a 3.1 Mb repeat, and the SNP-array result of foetus 2 was arr[hg19]22q11.2(18,648,855-21,464,764) x3; there was a 2.4 Mb repeat of 22q11.2. The CNV-Seq result of the peripheral blood of pregnant woman 1 was seq[hg19]22q11.2(18,953,139-21,449,967) x3; namely, in this mother's 22q11.2 region, there was ~2.5 Mb of duplicate fragment that was pathogenic to CNV. We confirmed that case 1 was inherited from the mother by CNV-seq. In both cases, however, there were key region deletions, including 41 OMIM genes such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
36722223W4310679717What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.