Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721979›Full record

ArticleClinical gerontologist

Illustrating a Person-Centered Approach to Financial Capacity Evaluations Through a Case Study.

Peter A Lichtenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gerontologist. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter A LichtenbergDirector, Institute of Gerontology and Distinguished Professor of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Funding

New methods to assess the intersection of financial decision making, financial management and financial exploitation in older adults with MCI or PCIR21AG067405 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LICHTENBERG, PETER A. · 2021 to 2022
$424k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG067405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlthough the National Institute of Medicine Social Security committee recommended that a person's financial capacity should be defined and assessed as real-world performance, there has been scant progress on creating methods to translate this idea into reliable methods. The current clinical comment focuses on analyzing actual financial management and decision-making in an evaluation to determine whether the older person needed a conservator.

methodsA case study is used to illustrate how to take a feasible approach to analyzing financial management and decisions and applying those to financial capacity assessment.

resultsBy employing a person-centered analysis of checking and credit card statements and using a semi-structured interview, the clinician was able to assess the financial management and decision-making skills of an older adult.

conclusionsClinical gerontologists have an ethical prerogative to enhance autonomy where possible. Analyzing a person's actual financial management records as opposed to hypothetical and perhaps unfamiliar financial tasks may represent a step forward in person-centered assessment of financial management and capacity. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinical gerontologists are often asked to provide financial capacity assessments. Using a person-centered approach to assessing financial management and financial decision-making offers a new and reliable method of assessing financial capacity.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMental CompetencyAgedGeriatriciansHumansUnited StatesagingcapacitycompetencyFinancial capacityfinancial decision-makingfinancial management

Identifiers

PMID36721979
PMCPMC10271959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.