Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721918›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

Psychometric properties of the Greek versions of the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale and the Pandemic-Related Postpartum Stress Scale and associated risk factors during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vassiliki Siafaka, Orestis Tsonis, Christos Christogiannis, Katerina-Maria Kontouli, Kalypso Margariti, Zoe Barbalia, Stefanos Flindris, Eleni Manifava, Kasmiria Ioanna Paschopoulou, Spyros Tzioras and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predictors of COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress: Prenatal and Postpartum Experiences in Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vassiliki SiafakaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-8825
Orestis TsonisAssisted Conception Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christos ChristogiannisEvidence Synthesis Methods Team, Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Katerina-Maria KontouliEvidence Synthesis Methods Team, Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Kalypso MargaritiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Zoe BarbaliaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Stefanos FlindrisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Eleni ManifavaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Kasmiria Ioanna PaschopoulouFaculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Spyros TziorasPrivate Sector, Ioannina, Greece.
Maria BaltogianniNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Dimitris MavridisEvidence Synthesis Methods Team, Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Minas PaschopoulosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
University of Ioannina · GRUniversity Hospital of Ioannina · GRGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected perinatal mental health. Reliable tools are needed to assess perinatal stress during pandemic situations.

aimsTo assess the psychometric properties of the Greek versions of the Pandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scale (PREPS) and the Pandemic-Related Postpartum Stress Scale (PREPS-PP) and to explore the associations between women's characteristics and perinatal stress during the second pandemic wave.

methodsThe PREPS and PREPS-PP were completed by 264 pregnant and 188 postpartum women, respectively, who also completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale (EPDS).

resultsThe internal consistency was similar for PREPS and PREPS-PP. It was good for preparedness stress (a = 0.77 and α = 0.71, respectively) and infection stress (α = 0.83 for both scales) but low for positive appraisal (α = 0.46 and α = 0.41, respectively). Of the pregnant women, 55.33% and 55.27%, respectively, reported scores of ≥40 on STAI-S and STAI-T, and the respective percentages for the postpartum women were 47.34% and 46.80%. In addition, 14.39% of the pregnant women and 20.74% of the postpartum women scored ≥13 on the EPDS. Higher preparedness stress on PREPS and PREPS-PP was associated with primiparity (

conclusionsThe Greek versions of PREPS and PREPS-PP are valid tools for the assessment of women at risk of perinatal stress during a health crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicPandemic-Related Postpartum Stress ScalePandemic-Related Pregnancy Stress Scalepsychometric propertiessecond wave

Identifiers

PMID36721918
PMCPMC9970181
OpenAlexW4318754224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.