Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721797›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2023

From Lab-Testing to Web-Testing in Cognitive Research: Who You Test is More Important than how You Test.

Kim Uittenhove, Stephanie Jeanneret, Evie Vergauwe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Accounting for unmet needs resulting from cancer-related cognitive impairment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The properties of personal semantics.Memory & cognition · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Work challenges and cancer-related cognitive impairment: level of education accounts for unmet needs beyond cognitive impairment severity.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Four (and a Half) Preregistered Failures to Replicate the Weapon Focus Effect in Online Samples.Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The MASCC COG-IMPACT: An unmet needs assessment for cancer-related cognitive impairment impact developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kim UittenhoveUniversity of Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5450-3875
Stephanie JeanneretUniversity of Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-6834
Evie VergauweUniversity of Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7339-2370
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition to

Indexed as

Data qualityWeb-testingWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID36721797
PMCPMC9854315
OpenAlexW4317434376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.