ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Safeness of Simultaneous Colonic Resection and Hepatic Radiofrequency Ablation.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting the Immunological Landscape of Locoregional Therapies for Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Shift Toward Interventional Immuno-Oncology.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Simultaneous Resection for Colorectal and Liver Metastases, new equipment and personalized medicine.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Previous reports showed an increased risk of infectious complications when liver radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is performed simultaneously to colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to compare early and long-term outcomes of simultaneous versus staged strategy. Methods: Data from colorectal cancer liver metastases consecutively treated by surgery of the primary tumor with an associated liver RFA procedure between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: RFA performed during colorectal surgery (simultaneous) or in a different moment (staged). Patients were manually matched (1:1) to minimize influence of known covariates. Results: Seventy-two patients were included. After matching, there was no difference between the two groups in morbidity or mortality. Hospital stay was 2 days shorter in the simultaneous group. Conclusions: Early or long-term outcomes were identical between the two strategies. The simultaneous strategy was associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization although not significant. Simultaneous colorectal resection and liver RFA is safe and must be included in surgeons' armamentarium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.