Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721662›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational immunology2023

The contribution of the alternative pathway in complement activation on cell surfaces depends on the strength of classical pathway initiation.

Esther Cw de Boer, Astrid Jf Thielen, Jeroen D Langereis, Angela Kamp, Mieke C Brouwer, Nienke Oskam, Marlieke L Jongsma, April J Baral, Robbert M Spaapen, Sacha Zeerleder and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Natural Modulators of Key Signaling Pathways in Skin Inflammageing.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Esther Cw de BoerDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8739-3577
Astrid Jf ThielenDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Jeroen D LangereisLaboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences Radboudumc Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5317-3202
Angela KampDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Mieke C BrouwerDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Nienke OskamDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Marlieke L JongsmaDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0695-6623
April J BaralTranslational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle upon Tyne UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9891-8228
Robbert M SpaapenDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1329-8606
Sacha ZeerlederDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-2019
Gestur VidarssonDepartment of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research, and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5621-003X
Theo RispensDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-1312
Diana WoutersDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Richard B PouwDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3469-8454
Ilse JongeriusDepartment of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7759-9897
Sanquin · NLNewcastle University · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The complement system is an important component of innate immunity. The alternative pathway (AP) amplification loop is considered an essential feed forward mechanism for complement activation. However, the role of the AP in classical pathway (CP) activation has only been studied in ELISA settings. Here, we investigated its contribution on physiologically relevant surfaces of human cells and bacterial pathogens and in antibody-mediated complement activation, including in autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) setting with autoantibodies against red blood cells (RBCs). Methods: We evaluated the contribution of the AP to complement responses initiated through the CP on human RBCs by serum of AIHA patients and recombinant antibodies. Moreover, we studied complement activation on Results: We show that the amplification loop is redundant when efficient CP activation takes place. This is independent of the presence of membrane-bound complement regulators. The role of the AP may become significant when insufficient CP complement activation occurs, but this depends on antibody levels and (sub)class. Our data indicate that therapeutic intervention in the amplification loop will most likely not be effective to treat antibody-mediated diseases. Conclusion: The AP can be bypassed through efficient CP activation. The AP amplification loop has a role in complement activation during conditions of modest activation via the CP, when it can allow for efficient complement-mediated killing.

Indexed as

alternative pathwayamplification loopantibodiesautoimmune haemolytic anaemiaclassical pathwaycomplement activation

Identifiers

PMID36721662
PMCPMC9881211
OpenAlexW4318220580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.