ReviewCureus2022
Common Causes of Failed Septoplasty: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical Outcomes of Bilateral Technique of Septal Extension Graft in Septorhinoplasty: A Single-center Experience.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Article
- Achieving a Strong and Straight Septal Extension Graft: A Novel Four-step Surgical Approach in Rhinoplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Failed septal correction is an undesirable outcome of primary septoplasty. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess all current studies concerning septoplasty failure, with a view to identifying its common causes. A systematic literature search was conducted by screening the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that assessed septoplasty failure and were published between January 2008 and January 2021. Three authors independently extracted information from each study and examined all included articles for bias. Four articles provided pertinent data regarding septoplasty failure. We gathered that missed nasal valve abnormality diagnosis, insufficient separation and resection of the bony-cartilaginous junction, and insufficient correction of caudal septal deviation could cause septoplasty failure. Additionally, iatrogenic problems, nasal asymmetry, and side-wall concavity involving the nasofrontal and columellar labial angles are contributing factors. Determining the cause of nasal blockage is challenging because it is subjective. Based on our findings, we concluded that in all patients with septal deviation, utmost care should be taken to avoid overlooking nasal valve abnormalities and other nasal diseases before conducting septoplasty. Moreover, inadequate correction of caudal septal deviation should be avoided. Furthermore, there is currently no widely accepted classification system for septal abnormalities to measure and describe septal deviation characteristics, making surgical planning and documentation difficult. Hence, further research that would lead to the creation of such a classification system is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.