ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports2022
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bidirectional relationship between the biofilm ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Digging Deep into Alzheimer Disease: How Electron Microscopy Helps Elucidating Its Pathogenesis.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Clinical translation of salivary MicroAge for understanding the oral-systemic connection in healthy longevity.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- The Oral-Brain Axis in Alzheimer's Disease: From Microbial Dysbiosis to Neurodegeneration.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Peptides: A Promising Alternative to Conventional Antimicrobials for Combating Polymicrobial Biofilms.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Characterization and morphological methods for oral biofilm visualization: where are we nowadays?AIMS microbiology · 2024Review
- From routine periodontal therapy to Alzheimer's disease early detection: A scoping review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral infection has been implicated in the possible etiology of Alzheimer's disease. Objective: To detect amyloid-β (Aβ) within microbial biofilms. Methods: Freshly extracted teeth ( Results: SEM demonstrated calculus and gutta percha Conclusion: This study detected both soluble and insoluble Aβ fibrils within the EPS of periodontal and endodontic natural biofilm, strongly suggesting its role as an antimicrobial peptide in combatting local infection, with potential risk for cross-seeding into the brain for AD development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.