ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2023
Automated Inline Myocardial Segmentation of Joint T1 and T2 Mapping Using Deep Learning.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the robustness of an artificial intelligence segmentation model for quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging across cardiac phenotypes.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Clinical Application of Deep Learning for Spine MRI Interpretation: A Multicenter Evaluation of Artificial-Intelligence-Assisted versus Manual Reading on Diagnostic Agreement with the Reference Standard.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- A pipeline for developing deep learning prognostic prediction models in cardiac magnetic resonance image analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Automated quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation times in liver mpMRI using deep learning: a sequence-adaptive approach.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Advanced Myocardial MRI Tissue Characterization Combining Contrast Agent-Free T1-Rho Mapping With Fully Automated Analysis.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Use of AI in Cardiac CT and MRI: A Scientific Statement from the ESCR, EuSoMII, NASCI, SCCT, SCMR, SIIM, and RSNA.Radiology · 2025Review
- [Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular radiology : Image acquisition, image reconstruction and workflow optimization].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Development and performance evaluation of fully automated deep learning-based models for myocardial segmentation on T1 mapping MRI data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Left Ventricle Detection from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Relaxometry Images Using Visual Transformer.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) solution for automated segmentation and analysis of joint cardiac MRI short-axis T1 and T2 mapping. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a joint T1 and T2 mapping sequence was used to acquire 4240 maps from 807 patients across two hospitals between March and November 2020. Five hundred nine maps from 94 consecutive patients were assigned to a holdout testing set. A convolutional neural network was trained to segment the endocardial and epicardial contours with use of an edge probability estimation approach. Training labels were segmented by an expert cardiologist. Predicted contours were processed to yield mapping values for each of the 16 American Heart Association segments. Network segmentation performance and segment-wise measurements on the testing set were compared with those of two experts on the holdout testing set. The AI model was fully integrated using open-source software to run on MRI scanners. Results: A total of 3899 maps (92%) were deemed artifact-free and suitable for human segmentation. AI segmentation closely matched that of each expert (mean Dice coefficient, 0.82 ± 0.07 [SD] vs expert 1 and 0.86 ± 0.06 vs expert 2) and compared favorably with interexpert agreement (Dice coefficient, 0.84 ± 0.06 for expert 1 vs expert 2). AI-derived segment-wise values for native T1, postcontrast T1, and T2 mapping correlated with expert-derived values ( Conclusion: Automated inline analysis of joint T1 and T2 mapping allows accurate segment-wise tissue characterization, with performance equivalent to that of human experts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.