Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721235›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2023

Survival benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Rong-Chang Wang, Jian-Qi Wang, Xiao-Yu Zhou, Chu-Lin Zhong, Jin-Xu Chen, Jing-Song Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rong-Chang Wang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Qi Wang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Yu Zhou *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Chu-Lin ZhongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Xu ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
Jing-Song ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China. hychenjs@126.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIn patients with colorectal cancer and clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis, the survival benefit of para-aortic lymphadenectomy is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to investigate it.

methodsPubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched until January 2000 to April 2022 to identify studies reporting overall survivals, complication rates, and hazard ratios of prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and those data were pooled.

resultsTwenty retrospective studies (1021 patients undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicates that participants undergoing para-aortic lymphadenectomy were associated with 5-year survival benefit, compared to those not receiving para-aortic lymphadenectomy (odds ratio = 3.73, 95% confidence interval: 2.05-6.78), but there was no significant difference in complication rate (odds ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-2.08). Further analysis of para-aortic lymphadenectomy group showed that 5-year survival of the positive group with pathologically para-aortic lymph node metastasis was lower than that of the negative group (odds ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.31). Moreover, complete resection (odds ratio = 5.26, 95% confidence interval: 2.02-13.69), para-aortic lymph node metastasis (≤4) (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-3.62), and medium-high differentiation (hazard ratio = 2.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.48-5.99) were protective factors for survival. Preoperative extra-retroperitoneal metastasis was associated with poorer relapse-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-3.10).

conclusionPara-aortic lymphadenectomy had promising clinical efficacy in prolonging survival rather than complication rate in patients with colorectal cancer and clinically diagnostic para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Further prospective studies should be performed.

trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD42022379276.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionHumansLymphatic MetastasisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesColorectal cancerMetastasisPara-aortic lymphadenectomyPara-aortic lymph nodeSurvival

Identifiers

PMID36721235
PMCPMC9887871
OpenAlexW4318612559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.