Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721208›Full record

ArticleJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2023

Frequency and accuracy of intraoperative bone margin sampling for T4a cancers of the head and neck at the QEII Health Sciences Centre: a retrospective chart review.

Anna-Claire Lamport, Colin A MacKay, Martin J Bullock, S Mark Taylor, Jonathan R Trites, Martin Corsten, Matthew H Rigby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna-Claire LamportFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Colin A MacKayDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Martin J BullockDepartment of Pathology, Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
S Mark TaylorDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jonathan R TritesDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Martin CorstenDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Matthew H RigbyDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada. mhrigby@dal.ca.
Dalhousie University · CA

Funding

Research Nova Scotia Establishment Grant PSO-EST-2019-2188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStage T4a cancers are associated with a 5-year survival of 21.6-59.0%. Adequate resection of these tumors is a critical factor in maximizing survival. Tumors invading bone pose a unique challenge to intraoperative bone margin assessment. Due to processing limitations, there had been no formal standardized protocol for intraoperative bone sampling at the QEII Health Sciences Centre. These resections often involve extensive reconstruction, making salvage surgery difficult if positive margins are detected post-surgically. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and frequency of intraoperative bone margin assessment during the study period and to determine survival and recurrence rates associated with positive final bone margins.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted including patients with stage T4a head and neck cancer involving bone that underwent primary surgical resection in Nova Scotia between 2009 and 2019. Eligible patients were identified through the Cancer Care Nova Scotia registry. Exclusion criteria included patients with stage T4a tumors involving bone that did not receive primary surgical treatment with curative intent and patients with stage T4a tumors that did not invade bone.

resultsOf 67 patients included, 50 were amenable to intraoperative bone margin sampling while 18 had intraoperative sampling. Four patients had positive intraoperative margins and one had final positive bone margins. The incidence of final bone margin positivity was 7.5%. Median survival following surgery was 4.56 years for patients with final negative bone margins (n = 62) and 3.98 years for patients with positive final bone margins (n = 5). All patients with final positive bone margins received adjuvant radiation therapy. Of patients with negative final bone margins, 16.1% received no adjuvant therapy, 61.3% received adjuvant radiation therapy and 21.0% received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

conclusionIntraoperative bone margin sampling occurred in 26.8% of all cases and 36.0% of amenable cases. Median survival of patients with positive final bone margins was 0.58 years lower than those with negative final bone margins, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. This will provide baseline data for comparison of the standardized intraoperative bone margin sampling protocol implemented at the QEII Health Sciences Centre.

Indexed as

HeadNeoplasmsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeckRetrospective StudiesBone marginsIntraoperative margin samplingStage T4a

Identifiers

PMID36721208
PMCPMC9890935
OpenAlexW4318716662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.