Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721192›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2023

Training and support for the role of facilitator in implementation of innovations in health and community care: a scoping review protocol.

Malin Tistad, Anna Bergström, Marie Elf, Leif Eriksson, Catharina Gustavsson, Camilla Göras, Gill Harvey, Ann-Sofie Källberg, Ann Rudman, Maria Unbeck and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Malin TistadSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, SE 791 88, Sweden. mti@du.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0581-2895
Anna BergströmUppsala Global Health Research on Implementation and Sustainability (UGHRIS), Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, SE 751 85, Sweden.
Marie ElfSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, SE 791 88, Sweden.
Leif ErikssonUppsala Global Health Research on Implementation and Sustainability (UGHRIS), Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, SE 751 85, Sweden.
Catharina GustavssonSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, SE 791 88, Sweden.
Camilla GörasSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, SE 791 88, Sweden.
Gill HarveyCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Ann-Sofie KällbergSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, SE 791 88, Sweden.
Ann RudmanSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, SE 791 88, Sweden.
Maria UnbeckSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, SE 791 88, Sweden.
Lars WallinSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, SE 791 88, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing and sustaining innovations in clinical practice, such as evidence-based practices, programmes, and policies, is frequently described as challenging. Facilitation as a strategy for supporting implementation requires a facilitator, i.e. an individual with a designated role to support the implementation process. A growing number of studies report that facilitation can help tackle the challenges in implementation efforts. To optimise the potential contribution of facilitation as a strategy to improve the implementation of new practices, there is a need to enhance understanding about what training and support is required for individuals in the facilitator role. The objective of this scoping review is to map how facilitators have been trained for, and supported in, the facilitator role in implementation studies in health and community care. Specifically, the review aims to examine what is reported on training and support of facilitators in terms of learning outcomes, content, dose, mode of delivery, learning activities, and qualifications of the trainers and how the facilitators perceive training and support.

methodsThis scoping review will follow the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review checklist. We will include articles in which (a) facilitation is deployed as an implementation strategy, with identified facilitator roles targeting staff and managers, to support the implementation of specified innovations in health or community care, and (b) training and/or support of facilitators is reported. We will exclude articles where facilitation is directed to education or training in specific clinical procedures or if facilitation supports the implementation of general quality improvement systems. All types of peer-reviewed studies and study protocols published in English will be included. A systematic search will be performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (embase.com), Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAHL (Ebsco). DISCUSSION: The proposed scoping review will provide a systematic mapping of the literature on the training and support of implementation facilitators and contribute useful knowledge within the field of implementation science to inform future facilitation initiatives. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered at Open Science Framework (registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M6NPQ ).

Indexed as

ChecklistLearningEducational StatusHumansImplementation ScienceMEDLINEScoping Reviews as TopicCommunity careEvidence-based practiceFacilitationFacilitatorHealthcare servicesImplementation sciencei-PARIHSSupervisionSupportTraining

Identifiers

PMID36721192
PMCPMC9887841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.