Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721162›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

Rural and urban differences in quality of dementia care of persons with dementia and caregivers across all domains: a systematic review.

Geneviève Arsenault-Lapierre, Tammy X Bui, Mélanie Le Berre, Howard Bergman, Isabelle Vedel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of national cognitive screening on dementia care and hospitalization in South Korea.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geneviève Arsenault-LapierreLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 5858 Ch. de La Côte-Des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada. genevieve.arsenault-lapierre@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-6857
Tammy X BuiLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 5858 Ch. de La Côte-Des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-1565
Mélanie Le BerreUniversité de Montréal, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, 4565 Chemin Queen Mary, Montreal, H3W 1W5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8461-4274
Howard BergmanDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Ch. de La Côte-Des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7410-1707
Isabelle VedelLady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, 5858 Ch. de La Côte-Des-Neiges, Suite 300, Montréal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6873-1681

Funding

Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging, Canada CNA-137794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are challenges in healthcare service delivery in rural areas, and this may be especially true for persons with dementia, who have higher needs to access to the healthcare system, and may have difficulties to commute easily and safely to these services. There is a growing body of literature regarding geographical disparities, but there is no comprehensive systematic review of geographical differences in persons with dementia across all domains of care quality. Therefore, the objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature on rural and urban differences in quality of dementia care outcomes of persons with dementia across all quality-of-care domains.

methodsWe performed a digital search in Ovid MEDLINE on July 16, 2019, updated on May 3, 2021, for French or English records. We selected studies that reported outcome from at least one domain of quality of dementia care (Access, Integration, Effective Care, Efficient Care, Population Health, Safety, and Patient-Centered) in both rural and urban persons with dementia or caregivers. We used rigorous, systematic methods for screening, selection, data extraction and we analyzed outcomes reported by at least two studies using vote counting and appraised the certainty of evidence. Finally, we explored sources of heterogeneity.

resultsFrom the 38 included studies, we found differences in many dementia care domains. Rural persons with dementia had higher mortality rates (Population Health), lower visits to any physicians (Access), more hospitalizations but shorter stays (Integration), higher antipsychotic medications (Safety), lower use of home care services and higher use of nursing home (Patient-Centered Care) compared to urban persons with dementia.

conclusionsThis comprehensive portrait of rural-urban differences in dementia care highlights possible geographically based inequities and can be used by researchers and decision makers to guide development of more equitable dementia care policies.

Indexed as

DementiaHome Care ServicesCaregiversGeographyHospitalizationHumansQuality of Health CareRural PopulationUrban PopulationDementiaQuality of HealthcareRural Health or Rural Health ServicesRural Population

Identifiers

PMID36721162
PMCPMC9887943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.