Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721153›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2023

CAR T cells: engineered immune cells to treat brain cancers and beyond.

Zoufang Huang, Saikat Dewanjee, Pratik Chakraborty, Niraj Kumar Jha, Abhijit Dey, Moumita Gangopadhyay, Xuan-Yu Chen, Jian Wang, Saurabh Kumar Jha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Glioblastoma research on zebrafish xenograft models: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CAR-T Cell Therapy for Central Nervous System Tumors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Prospects of Synergy: Local Interventions and CAR T Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zoufang Huang *Department of Hematology, Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Saikat Dewanjee *Advanced Pharmacognosy Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India.
Pratik ChakrabortyAdvanced Pharmacognosy Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India.
Niraj Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India.
Abhijit DeyDepartment of Life Sciences, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700032, India.
Moumita GangopadhyayDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Adamas University, Barasat, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700126, India.
Xuan-Yu ChenInstitute for Biotechnology, St. John's University, Queens, New York, 11439, USA.
Jian WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, the Affiliated Jiangyin People's Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangyin, 214400, China. 1627879372@qq.com.
Saurabh Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India. saurabh.jha@sharda.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-7437-0755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant brain tumors rank among the most challenging type of malignancies to manage. The current treatment protocol commonly entails surgery followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, however, the median patient survival rate is poor. Recent developments in immunotherapy for a variety of tumor types spark optimism that immunological strategies may help patients with brain cancer. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells exploit the tumor-targeting specificity of antibodies or receptor ligands to direct the cytolytic capacity of T cells. Several molecules have been discovered as potential targets for immunotherapy-based targeting, including but not limited to EGFRvIII, IL13Rα2, and HER2. The outstanding clinical responses to CAR T cell-based treatments in patients with hematological malignancies have generated interest in using this approach to treat solid tumors. Research results to date support the astounding clinical response rates of CD19-targeted CAR T cells, early clinical experiences in brain tumors demonstrating safety and evidence for disease-modifying activity, and the promise for further advances to ultimately assist patients clinically. However, several variable factors seem to slow down the progress rate regarding treating brain cancers utilizing CAR T cells. The current study offers a thorough analysis of CAR T cells' promise in treating brain cancer, including design and delivery considerations, current strides in clinical and preclinical research, issues encountered, and potential solutions.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntibodiesAntigens, CD19Cell DeathHumansReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAntibodiesAntigens, CD19Receptors, Chimeric AntigenBrain cancerCAR T cellsClinical trialsHematological cancerImmunotherapySolid tumorsTumor antigen

Identifiers

PMID36721153
PMCPMC9890802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.