Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36721113›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum experience in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 in Paris: a qualitative phenomenological study.

Jean-Sébastien Cadwallader, Laura Berlingo, Valentine Rémy, Marc Dommergues, Julie Gilles de la Londe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-Sébastien CadwalladerDepartment of General Practice, Sorbonne University, 27 Rue Chaligny, Paris, 75012, France. jscadwallader@yahoo.fr.
Laura BerlingoDepartment of Gynaecology Ans Obstetrics, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), DMU Origyne, Sorbonne University, Paris, 75013, France.
Valentine RémyDepartment of Gynaecology Ans Obstetrics, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), DMU Origyne, Sorbonne University, Paris, 75013, France.
Marc DommerguesDepartment of Gynaecology Ans Obstetrics, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), DMU Origyne, Sorbonne University, Paris, 75013, France.
Julie Gilles de la LondeDepartment of General Practice, Université de Paris, Paris, F-75018, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRYahoo (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdowns triggered social discontent on an unprecedented scale. Descriptive phenomenological studies showed that pregnant women were under intense stress during the COVID-19 outbreak, even though they remained uninfected. The purpose of this study was to report on the experiences of pregnant women affected by mild COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic.

methodsIn this non- interventional qualitative study, we analyzed pregnant women's experiences using an interpretive phenomenological analysis approach. We conducted semi-structured interviews with women who had had a mild COVID-19 during their pregnancy, and gave birth or planned to give birth in the maternity units of Sorbonne University in Paris, France.

resultsParticipants reported that at the time they had COVID-19, they were not afraid of being seriously ill, but of transmitting COVID-19 to their close relatives. Their main concern was being pregnant and becoming a parent in a world where the pandemic deeply altered social environment. This included uncertainty about the future and an acute feeling of isolation related to lockdown. The idea that their partner might not be allowed to attend childbirth was almost unanimously felt as intolerable. In contrast, women had positive feelings regarding the fact that lockdown resulted in a de facto paternity leave leading to a certain degree of equality in the couple regarding baby care and household chores. Unexpectedly, the pandemic social distancing measures helped participants escaping from behavioral constraints, including the unspoken rule that they should welcome greetings from friends and family, despite being exhausted by the recent birth.

conclusionsOur results suggest that avoiding separation from their partner is a key to benevolent medical care for pregnant women in times of health crises. The unexpected benefits women reported in a world of lockdown cast a new light on their expectation regarding parenthood today.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Communicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansInfantPandemicsParisPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnant PeopleCOVID-19PhenomenologicalPregnant womenQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36721113
PMCPMC9887563
OpenAlexW4318612593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.