ArticleScientific reports2023
The physician factor and anatomical site in 8846 consecutive mediastinal lymph node aspirations in a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mediastinal lymph node fine needle aspiration (MLN-FNA) is a common procedure; however, the physician factor in pathological category, and anatomical site are not routinely assessed. Cytology reports for endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)/endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) MLN-FNA specimens (8846) were retrieved for July 2012-Dec 2019, classified by hierarchical free text string match algorithm into 51 diagnostic categories, four mutually exclusive diagnostic groups (benign |suspicious |malignant |insufficient), and 24 anatomical sites. Pathologist and submitting physician/surgeon bias were assessed using logistic regression and funnel plots|control charts centered on the group median (diagnostic/capture) rate. Eleven pathologists and seven submitting physician/surgeon were involved in more than 250 specimens each. Overall, the MLN-FNAs were benign|suspicious|malignant|insufficient in 46%|4%|25%|24% of specimens. Percent malignant (number of samples) varied by station; 7| 4R| 4L| 2R| 10R| 11R| 11L were respectively 21%(3,101), 27%(2,453), 19%(1,289), 41%(435), 27%(497), 24%(357), 26%(229). The number of outlier (P < 0.05/P < 0.001) pathologists of 11 from the group median rate for benign|suspicious|malignant|insufficient was 0/0| 3/1| 0/0| 3/0 respectively. The outlier (P < 0.05/P < 0.001) submitting physicians/surgeons of 7 for benign|suspicious|malignant|insufficient was 3/2| 2/2| 3/2| 3/2 respectively. The physician and anatomical site are significant predictors of MLN-FNA pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.