ArticleScientific reports2023
Quantifying microstructures of earth materials using higher-order spatial correlations and deep generative adversarial networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational Intelligence in Stochastic Reconstruction of Porous Microstructures for Image-Based Poro/Micro-Mechanical Modeling.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The key to most subsurface processes is to determine how structural and topological features at small length scales, i.e., the microstructure, control the effective and macroscopic properties of earth materials. Recent progress in imaging technology has enabled us to visualise and characterise microstructures at different length scales and dimensions. However, one limitation of these technologies is the trade-off between resolution and sample size (or representativeness). A promising approach to this problem is image reconstruction which aims to generate statistically equivalent microstructures but at a larger scale and/or additional dimension. In this work, a stochastic method and three generative adversarial networks (GANs), namely deep convolutional GAN (DCGAN), Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP), and StyleGAN2 with adaptive discriminator augmentation (ADA), are used to reconstruct two-dimensional images of two hydrothermally rocks with varying degrees of complexity. For the first time, we evaluate and compare the performance of these methods using multi-point spatial correlation functions-known as statistical microstructural descriptors (SMDs)-ultimately used as external tools to the loss functions. Our findings suggest that a well-trained GAN can reconstruct higher-order, spatially-correlated patterns of complex earth materials, capturing underlying structural and morphological properties. Comparing our results with a stochastic reconstruction method based on a two-point correlation function, we show the importance of coupling training/assessment of GANs with higher-order SMDs, especially in the case of complex microstructures. More importantly, by quantifying original and reconstructed microstructures via different GANs, we highlight the interpretability of these SMDs and show how they can provide valuable insights into the spatial patterns in the synthetic images, allowing us to detect common artefacts and failure cases in training GANs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.