ArticleScientific reports2023
Odor discrimination is immune to the effects of verbal labels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral Relevance of Early Neural Coding of Low-Level Odor Features in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neuroimaging evaluations of olfactory, gustatory, and neurological deficits in patients with long-term sequelae of COVID-19.Brain imaging and behavior · 2024Article
- How well can young adults and children discriminate between odors?Psychological research · 2024Article
- Olfactory Testing With Focus on Odor Identification for Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease in Mild Cognitive Impairment.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For many odors that we encounter in daily life, we perceive their qualities without being able to specifically identify their sources-an experience termed the "tip-of-the-nose" phenomenon. Does learning an odor's identity alter our experience of it? Past work has shown that labeling odors can alter how we describe and react to them, but it remains an open question whether such changes extend to the level of perception, making an odor actually smell different. Here, in a set of odor classification experiments we tested whether attaching labels to odors can alter their perceptual discriminability. We found that even for odors whose reported similarity changed markedly when their identities were revealed, their discriminability remained unchanged by labels. Our findings indicate that two critical functions of olfaction-parsing the odor environment and supporting the subjective experience of odor qualities-access distinct odor representations within the olfactory processing stream.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.