ArticleScientific reports2023
Detection of abnormal extraocular muscles in small datasets of computed tomography images using a three-dimensional variational autoencoder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to establish an unsupervised algorithm with a three-dimensional (3D) variational autoencoder model (VAE) for the detection of abnormal extraocular muscles in small datasets of orbital computed tomography (CT) images. 334 CT images of normal orbits and 96 of abnormal orbits diagnosed as thyroid eye disease were used for training and validation; 24 normal and 11 abnormal orbits were used for the test. A 3D VAE was developed and trained. All images were preprocessed to emphasize extraocular muscles and to suppress background noise (e.g., high signal intensity from bones). The optimal cut-off value was identified through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The ability of the model to detect muscles of abnormal size was assessed by visualization. The model achieved a sensitivity of 79.2%, specificity of 72.7%, accuracy of 77.1%, F1-score of 0.667, and AUROC of 0.801. Abnormal CT images correctly identified by the model showed differences in the reconstruction of extraocular muscles. The proposed model showed potential to detect abnormalities in extraocular muscles using a small dataset, similar to the diagnostic approach used by physicians. Unsupervised learning could serve as an alternative detection method for medical imaging studies in which annotation is difficult or impossible to perform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.