Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36720777›Full record

ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2023

Multidimensional Evaluation of Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment Training for Medical Students.

Nicholas W McAfee, Julie A Schumacher, Daniel C Williams, Michael B Madson, Courtney L Bagge, Deborah Konkle-Parker, Ian A Paul, L Joy Houston, Kathleen M Young

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas W McAfeeUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA. nmcafee@umc.edu.
Julie A SchumacherUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Daniel C WilliamsUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Michael B MadsonUniversity of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Courtney L BaggeUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Deborah Konkle-ParkerUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Ian A PaulUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
L Joy HoustonSouthern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA.
Kathleen M YoungNew Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC, USA.
University of Mississippi Medical Center · USJackson Memorial Hospital · USNew Hanover Regional Medical Center · USSouthern Illinois University School of Medicine · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Southern Mississippi · US

Funding

SAMHSA HHS T1026047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveScreening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based approach to identifying and addressing alcohol use in non-specialty settings. Many medical schools teach SBIRT, but most published evaluations of these efforts exclude rigorous skill assessments and teaching methods.

methodsDuring the 2017-2018 academic year, 146 third-year medical students received classroom-based learning on SBIRT and motivational interviewing (MI) and at least two SBIRT practices with feedback as part of a 4-week psychiatry clerkship. The objective of this curriculum was to improve SBIRT knowledge, attitudes, and confidence and enable learners to skillfully deliver SBIRT. Outcomes evaluated included satisfaction, knowledge, attitudes and confidence, and clinical skill in delivering SBIRT to a standardized patient (rated by the actor, as well as an expert).

resultsResults indicated acceptable satisfaction at post-curriculum and significant improvements in attitudes and knowledge from pre- to post-curriculum. On the clinical skills exam, all students were rated as having mastered at least 80% of SBIRT elements by standardized patients and 91.8% were rated at this level by a faculty expert. Student attitudes and knowledge were unrelated to expert ratings, and standardized patient ratings had limited associations with expert ratings.

conclusionsThese results suggest curriculum objectives were achieved and provide unique contributions to the SBIRT curricular outcome research for healthcare trainees. Other findings included that trainee knowledge and confidence may not relate to skill, and standardized patient feedback provides different information on SBIRT and MI skill than expert ratings.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPsychotherapy, BriefStudents, MedicalSubstance-Related DisordersCrisis InterventionCurriculumHumansMass ScreeningReferral and ConsultationClerkshipCurriculumMotivational interviewingScreening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to TreatmentSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID36720777
OpenAlexW4318701094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.