Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36720727›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2023

Machine Learning for Dementia Prediction: A Systematic Review and Future Research Directions.

Ashir Javeed, Ana Luiza Dallora, Johan Sanmartin Berglund, Arif Ali, Liaqat Ali, Peter Anderberg

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
37.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The role of brain health and resilience in reshaping trajectories of late-life neuropsychiatric disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashir Javeed *Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen, Stockholm, 17165, Solna, Sweden.
Ana Luiza Dallora *Department of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Valhallavägen 1, Karlskrona, 37141, Blekinge, Sweden.
Johan Sanmartin BerglundDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Valhallavägen 1, Karlskrona, 37141, Blekinge, Sweden. johan.sanmartin.berglund@bth.se.
Arif AliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Township, Bannu, 28100, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Liaqat AliDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Bannu, Township, Bannu, 28100, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Peter AnderbergDepartment of Health, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Valhallavägen 1, Karlskrona, 37141, Blekinge, Sweden.
Blekinge Institute of Technology · SEUniversity of Science and Technology Bannu · PKUniversity of Skövde · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have successfully provided automated solutions to numerous real-world problems. Healthcare is one of the most important research areas for ML researchers, with the aim of developing automated disease prediction systems. One of the disease detection problems that AI and ML researchers have focused on is dementia detection using ML methods. Numerous automated diagnostic systems based on ML techniques for early prediction of dementia have been proposed in the literature. Few systematic literature reviews (SLR) have been conducted for dementia prediction based on ML techniques in the past. However, these SLR focused on a single type of data modality for the detection of dementia. Hence, the purpose of this study is to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of ML-based automated diagnostic systems considering different types of data modalities such as images, clinical-features, and voice data. We collected the research articles from 2011 to 2022 using the keywords dementia, machine learning, feature selection, data modalities, and automated diagnostic systems. The selected articles were critically analyzed and discussed. It was observed that image data driven ML models yields promising results in terms of dementia prediction compared to other data modalities, i.e., clinical feature-based data and voice data. Furthermore, this SLR highlighted the limitations of the previously proposed automated methods for dementia and presented future directions to overcome these limitations.

Indexed as

DementiaVoiceArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningDeep learningDementia predictionFeature selectionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36720727
PMCPMC9889464
OpenAlexW4318678031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.