Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36720720›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2023

Methodological considerations on segmenting rhabdomyosarcoma with diffusion-weighted imaging-What can we do better?

Cyrano Chatziantoniou, Reineke A Schoot, Roelof van Ewijk, Rick R van Rijn, Simone A J Ter Horst, Johannes H M Merks, Alexander Leemans, Alberto De Luca

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cyrano ChatziantoniouImage Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.chatziantoniou-3@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-2580
Reineke A SchootPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roelof van EwijkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rick R van RijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Simone A J Ter HorstPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johannes H M MerksPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexander LeemansImage Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alberto De LucaImage Sciences Institute, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Princess Máxima Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiffusion-weighted MRI is a promising technique to monitor response to treatment in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. However, its validation in clinical practice remains challenging. This study aims to investigate how the tumor segmentation strategy can affect the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature review was performed in PubMed using search terms relating to MRI and sarcomas to identify commonly applied segmentation strategies. Seventy-six articles were included, and their presented segmentation methods were evaluated. Commonly reported segmentation strategies were then evaluated on diffusion-weighted imaging of five pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma patients to assess their impact on ADC.

resultsWe found that studies applied different segmentation strategies to define the shape of the region of interest (ROI)(outline 60%, circular ROI 27%), to define the segmentation volume (2D 44%, multislice 9%, 3D 21%), and to define the segmentation area (excludes edge 7%, excludes other region 19%, specific area 27%, whole tumor 48%). In addition, details of the segmentation strategy are often unreported. When implementing and comparing these strategies on in-house data, we found that excluding necrotic, cystic, and hemorrhagic areas from segmentations resulted in on average 5.6% lower mean ADC. Additionally, the slice location used in 2D segmentation methods could affect ADC by as much as 66%.

conclusionDiffusion-weighted MRI studies in pediatric sarcoma currently employ a variety of segmentation methods. Our study shows that different segmentation strategies can result in vastly different ADC measurements, highlighting the importance to further investigate and standardize segmentation.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingRhabdomyosarcomaSarcoma

Identifiers

PMID36720720
PMCPMC9889596
OpenAlexW4318753686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.