Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36720631›Full record

ArticleInjury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention2023

Effectiveness of systematically delivered evidence-based home safety promotion to improve child home safety practices: a controlled before-and-after study.

Michael James Taylor, Elizabeth Orton, Tina Patel, Clare Timblin, Rachel Clarke, Michael Craig Watson, Mike Hayes, Matthew Jones, Carol Coupland, Denise Kendrick

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Cost-effectiveness of the 'Stay One Step Ahead' Home Safety programme for the prevention of injuries among children under 5 years.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael James TaylorHealthcare Public Health Team, NHS England and NHS Improvement Midlands, Nottingham, UK michael.taylor2@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2755-7314
Elizabeth OrtonCentre for Academic Primary Care, Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2531-8846
Tina PatelCentre for Academic Primary Care, Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Clare TimblinCentre for Academic Primary Care, Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Rachel ClarkeCentre for Academic Primary Care, Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Michael Craig WatsonInstitute of Health Promotion and Education, Altrincham, UK.
Mike HayesChild Accident Prevention Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7738-9451
Matthew JonesCentre for Academic Primary Care, Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4824-9724
Carol CouplandCentre for Academic Primary Care, Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-3306
Denise KendrickCentre for Academic Primary Care, Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3603-6542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the effectiveness of systematically delivered evidence-based home safety promotion for improving child home safety practices.

designControlled before-and-after study.

settingNine electoral wards in Nottingham, UK.

participants361 families with children aged 2-7 months at recruitment living in four intervention wards with high health, education and social need; and 401 in five matched control wards.

interventionEvidence-based home safety promotion delivered by health visiting teams, family mentors and children's centres including 24 monthly safety messages; home safety activity sessions; quarterly 'safety weeks'; home safety checklists. OUTCOMES: Primary: composite measure comprising having a working smoke alarm, storing poisons out of reach and having a stairgate. Secondary: other home safety practices; medically attended injuries. Parents completed questionnaires at 12 and 24 months after recruitment plus optional three monthly injury questionnaires.

resultsAt 24 months there was no significant difference between groups in the primary outcome (55.8% vs 48.8%; OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.55) or medically attended injury rates (incidence rate ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.56), but intervention families were more likely to store poisons safely (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.07), have a fire escape plan (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.08), use a fireguard or have no fire (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.16) and perform more safety practices (β 0.46, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.79).

conclusionsSystematic evidence-based home safety promotion in areas with substantial need increases adoption of some safety practices. Funders should consider commissioning evidence-based multicomponent child home safety interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN31210493.

Indexed as

FiresPoisonsChildControlled Before-After StudiesHumansParentsPoisonschildeducationhomepublic health

Identifiers

PMID36720631
PMCPMC10313983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.