Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36720405›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2023

Prevalence and associations of challenging, difficult or distressing experiences using classic psychedelics.

Otto Simonsson, Peter S Hendricks, Richard Chambers, Walter Osika, Simon B Goldberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of psychedelic use on authoritarian attitudes revisited.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Relationship Between Naturalistic Psychedelic Use and Grandiose Narcissism: An Online Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Classifying Psychedelic-Related Complications.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Informed Consent in Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Guiding Through Challenging Psychedelic Experiences and "Bad Trips".Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Traumatic Psychedelic Experiences.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Otto SimonssonCenter for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: otto.simonsson@ki.se.
Peter S HendricksDepartment of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Richard ChambersMonash Centre for Consciousness & Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Walter OsikaCenter for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Simon B GoldbergCenter for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Mindfulness training delivered via mobile health to reduce depression and anxietyK23AT010879 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOLDBERG, SIMON B · 2020 to 2024
$786k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT010879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have investigated challenging, difficult, or distressing classic psychedelic experiences, but little is known about the prevalence and associations of such experiences. Using nationally representative data of the US adult population (N = 2822), this study examined the prevalence and associations of challenging, difficult, or distressing experiences using classic psychedelics, in a subsample of respondents who reported lifetime classic psychedelic use (n = 613). Of the 613 respondents who reported lifetime classic psychedelic use, the majority of them (59.1 %) had never had a challenging, difficult, or distressing experience using a classic psychedelic, but 8.9 % of respondents reported functional impairment that lasted longer than one day as a result of such experiences. Notably, 2.6 % reported seeking medical, psychiatric, or psychological assistance in the days or weeks following their most challenging, difficult, or distressing classic psychedelic experience. In covariate-adjusted regression models, co-use of lithium, co-use of other mood stabilizers, and six set and setting variables (no preparation, disagreeable physical environment, negative mindset, no psychological support, dose was too large, major life event prior to experience) were associated with the degree of difficulty; and co-use of lithium, co-use of other mood stabilizers, and three set and setting variables (negative mindset, no psychological support, major life event prior to experience) were associated with overall risk of harm. In summary, this study provides insight into the prevalence and associations of challenging, difficult, or distressing classic psychedelic experiences. The findings broadly correspond with findings from previous studies and can inform harm reduction efforts and future experimental research designs.

Indexed as

HallucinogensSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeAdultHarm ReductionHumansLithiumPrevalenceHallucinogensLithiumAdverseCEQChallengingLSDPsilocybinPsychedelicsRisk

Identifiers

PMID36720405
PMCPMC9974873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.