Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36720263›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2023

Is tranexamic acid associated with decreased need for blood transfusion in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

S Prasad, G Sharma, S Kumar Devana, S Kumar, S Sharma

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tranexamic acid for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S PrasadMM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Ambala, India.
G SharmaPGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
S Kumar DevanaPGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
S KumarPGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
S SharmaVMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · INSafdarjang Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBleeding is a common complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for renal stone disease. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been found to reduce mortality and blood transfusion in surgical and trauma patients. This review aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of TXA in patients undergoing PNL.

methodsA systematic literature review was performed to recognise all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of TXA in PNL. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the need for blood transfusion with and without TXA.

findingsSix RCTs with 1,323 patients were included in this review. Haemoglobin fall was lower in the TXA group compared with the control group, and the need for blood transfusion was reduced by 67% (odds ratio (OR) 0.33, confidence interval (CI) (0.21, 0.52),

conclusionsTXA is safe and efficacious for PNL with a reduction in need for blood transfusion and without an attending increase in complication rates.

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousTranexamic AcidBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionHumansAntifibrinolytic AgentsTranexamic AcidMeta-analysisPercutaneous nephrolithotomyTranexamic acid

Identifiers

PMID36720263
PMCPMC9889173
OpenAlexW4210775956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.