Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36720235›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023

[Academic Careers in Medicine: a Sex-Related Analysis of Career Goals].

Heiko Sorg, Jörg Hauser, Mahsa Bagheri, Jan Peter Ehlers, Irini Helena Leifeld, Paul Christian Fuchs, Daniel Johannes Tilkorn, Christian Günter Georg Sorg

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heiko SorgLehrstuhl für Didaktik und Bildungsforschung im Gesundheitswesen, Universität Witten/Herdecke Fakultät für Gesundheit, Witten.ORCID 0000-0001-6827-0857
Jörg HauserKlinik für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Handchirurgie, Alfried-Krupp-Krankenhaus, Essen.
Mahsa BagheriKlinik für Plastische Chirurgie, Handchirurgie, Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Klinikum Köln Merheim, Köln.
Jan Peter EhlersLehrstuhl für Didaktik und Bildungsforschung im Gesundheitswesen, Universität Witten/Herdecke Fakultät für Gesundheit, Witten.
Irini Helena LeifeldKlinik für Plastisch-rekonstruktive, Ästhetische und Handchirurgie, Klinikum Kassel GmbH, Kassel.
Paul Christian FuchsKlinik für Plastische Chirurgie, Handchirurgie, Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Klinikum Köln Merheim, Köln.
Daniel Johannes TilkornKlinik für Plastische, Rekonstruktive und Ästhetische Chirurgie, Handchirurgie, Alfried-Krupp-Krankenhaus, Essen.
Christian Günter Georg SorgLehrstuhl für Management und Innovation im Gesundheitswesen, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten.
Witten/Herdecke University · DEAlfried Krupp Hospital · DEKlinikum Kassel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyFor female and male physicians of the clinical-academic mid-level staff, working conditions as well as the attitude towards profession and career play a decisive role. For years, there has been an increasing proportion of women in medicine. Despite this increase, a significant sex incongruence is still evident, especially in academic medicine. The aim of this work was to analyze current opinions of female and male physicians on sex-related aspects for career.

methodsBy means of an online survey, medical mid-level staff from university and peripheral hospitals were asked about professional biographical as well as career-related topics and the data analyzed in terms of the sexes.

resultsCompared to their male counterparts, female physicians had lower career goals and mainly aimed to qualify as senior physicians. Women planned to have families and raise children earlier in their careers. Men were more likely to have their professional careers in mind during the same time period. Although only just under 47% of respondents considered an academic career to be worthwhile, 65% continued to rate the acquisition of an academic title highly. When evaluating equal treatment by superiors, female physicians tended to feel disadvantaged in their professional careers compared to male physicians. Thus, physicians rated the treatment by their respective superiors as characterized by the quality of the work (44% for both genders of superiors) or dependent on sympathy (female superiors 30%; male superiors 24%). Female physicians, however, saw a preference for male colleagues in 37% of male superiors.

conclusionDespite a significantly larger proportion of women in medicine for decades, there is still an incongruence in sexes in favor of men in management positions. The professional and private goals of women and men differ significantly depending on their age decade. The academic career per se is increasingly losing importance, although the acquisition of academic degrees still seems to be desirable. Therefore, to improve the future of academic medicine, significant structural changes are needed to enable projectable career paths (e. g., tenure track, assistant professorship, young medical professionals model) for mid-level academic staff.

Indexed as

PhysiciansPhysicians, WomenCareer ChoiceCareer MobilityChildFemaleGermanyGoalsHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36720235
PMCPMC11248572
OpenAlexW4318687058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.