Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36719846›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2023

Early Microjet Experimentation with Liquid Water in Vacuum.

Manfred Faubel

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Electron Transfer and Negative Ion Formation.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manfred FaubelMax-Planck-Institut für Dynamik und Selbstorganisation Bunsenstrasse 10, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ConspectusIn this brief look at the history of liquid microjets, I recollect some personal reminiscences on initial challenges for introduction of this method, as well as unexpected problems and exemplary results using this new tool for liquid evaporation and photoelectron spectroscopy studies.Many efficient and direct, atomic level diagnostic instruments in use at solid state surfaces and in gas-phase atom or cluster studies require high vacuum. They have therefore not been applied to investigations of aqueous solutions because liquid water both strongly evaporates and rapidly freezes in vacuum. Only fairly recently, over the past three decades, have liquid microjets been considered as practicable targets for research on liquid-water interfaces in vacuum. The working principle is analogous to the functioning of a free molecular beam source, where molecules enter through a small aperture into a vacuum without being disturbed by subsequent collisions in their original Maxwellian velocity distribution. Similarly, above a microjet surface in vacuum, water vapor molecules do not interact with each other, or with different probe particles, as long as the liquid jet diameter is small in relation to the mean free path of the liquids' vapor at equilibrium conditions. For pure liquid water, this constraint is

Identifiers

PMID36719846
PMCPMC10035024
OpenAlexW4318671525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read3
measurements read11
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.