Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36719721›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

A Web-Based Decision Aid for Caregivers of Persons With Dementia With Firearm Access (Safe at Home Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Virginia McCarthy, Jennifer Portz, Stacy M Fischer, Emily Greenway, Rachel L Johnson, Christopher E Knoepke, Daniel D Matlock, Faris Omeragic, Ryan A Peterson, Megan L Ranney and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05173922 ("Safety in Dementia"), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05173922 nacompletednot on this map

"Safety in Dementia": An Online Caregiver Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2022 to 2024Enrolled500ConditionsCaregivers, Decision Making, Alzheimer Disease, Social MediaArmsSafety in Dementia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Virginia McCarthy *Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9265-054X
Jennifer Portz *Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-3598
Stacy M Fischer *Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-7576
Emily Greenway *Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4683-7717
Rachel L Johnson *Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3002-5412
Christopher E Knoepke *Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-7157
Daniel D Matlock *Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-9642
Faris Omeragic *Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0509-9754
Ryan A Peterson *Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4650-5798
Megan L Ranney *Brown-Lifespan Center for Digital Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-9642
Marian E Betz *Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-6565

Funding

"Safety in Dementia": An Online Caregiver Intervention.R01AG076364 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BETZ, MARIAN ELIZABETH · 2021 to 2021
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirearm safety among individuals with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) is an underdiscussed and underresearched concern in the United States, especially given the growing population of community-dwelling adults with ADRD. The "Safety in Dementia" (SiD) web-based decision aid was developed to support caregivers in addressing firearm access; the efficacy of SiD is unknown.

objectiveThrough the SiD decision aid, the Safe at Home (S@H) study aims to support caregivers in making decisions about home safety that align with their goals and values, and behaviors regarding firearm access for persons with ADRD and firearm access.

methodsThe S@H study is a 2-armed randomized controlled trial to test the effect of the SiD decision aid on caregivers of community-dwelling adults with ADRD who have firearm access. S@H aims to recruit 500 ADRD caregivers (age ≥18 years, fluent in English or Spanish, and in the United States) through online or social media advertisements and through relevant organizations. Participants are randomized to view SiD or a control website at their own pace; all participants complete web-based questionnaires at baseline, 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome is immediate preparation for decision-making; secondary outcomes include longitudinal decision outcomes and self-reported modifications to firearm access. The relative reach and effectiveness of each recruitment method (online/social media and through relevant organizations) will be assessed by examining differences in caregiver participation, retention rates, and relative cost.

resultsThe study enrollment began in May 2022. As of December 2022, a total of 117 participants had enrolled.

conclusionsThe S@H study is the first randomized trial of a firearm safety decision aid for ADRD caregivers. The results from this study will inform how best to support caregivers in decision-making regarding firearm safety. Further, results may guide approaches for recruiting caregivers and for dissemination of resources.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05173922; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05173922. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/43702.

Indexed as

ADRDAlzheimerscaregiverdecisiondecision aid decision-makingdementiafirearmsstorageweb-based

Identifiers

PMID36719721
PMCPMC9929727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.