Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36719639›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2023

Application of Cell Penetrating Peptides as a Promising Drug Carrier to Combat Viral Infections.

Niloofar Khairkhah, Ali Namvar, Azam Bolhassani

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Anti-Herpetic Activity of Killer Peptide (KP): An In Vitro Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Long-Acting Ocular Injectables: Are We Looking In The Right Direction?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niloofar KhairkhahDepartment of Hepatitis and AIDS, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Ali NamvarIranian Comprehensive Hemophilia Care Center, Tehran, Iran.
Azam BolhassaniDepartment of Hepatitis and AIDS, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran. azam.bolhassani@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7363-7406
Pasteur Institute of Iran · IRHemophilia Center of Iran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel effective drugs or therapeutic vaccines have been already developed to eradicate viral infections. Some non-viral carriers have been used for effective drug delivery to a target cell or tissue. Among them, cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) attracted a special interest to enhance drug delivery into the cells with low toxicity. They were also applied to transfer peptide/protein-based and nucleic acids-based therapeutic vaccines against viral infections. CPPs-conjugated drugs or vaccines were investigated in several viral infections including poliovirus, Ebola, coronavirus, herpes simplex virus, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, and influenza A virus. Some studies showed that the uptake of CPPs or CPPs-conjugated drugs can be performed through both non-endocytic and endocytic pathways. Despite high potential of CPPs for cargo delivery, there are some serious drawbacks such as non-tissue-specificity, instability, and suboptimal pharmacokinetics features that limit their clinical applications. At present, some solutions are utilized to improve the CPPs properties such as conjugation of CPPs with targeting moieties, the use of fusogenic lipids, generation of the proton sponge effect, etc. Up to now, no CPP or composition containing CPPs has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) due to the lack of sufficient in vivo studies on stability, immunological assays, toxicity, and endosomal escape of CPPs. In this review, we briefly describe the properties, uptake mechanisms, advantages and disadvantages, and improvement of intracellular delivery, and bioavailability of cell penetrating peptides. Moreover, we focus on their application as an effective drug carrier to combat viral infections.

Indexed as

Cell-Penetrating PeptidesVirus DiseasesDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansProteinsCell-Penetrating PeptidesDrug CarriersProteinsAntiviral therapyCell penetrating peptideDrugIntracellular deliveryPhysicochemical propertiesUptake mechanism

Identifiers

PMID36719639
PMCPMC9888354
OpenAlexW4318670848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.