Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36719608›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2023

Prophylaxis of Ocular Infection in the Setting of Intraocular Surgery: Implications for Clinical Practice and Risk Management.

Alfredo Borgia, Daniela Mazzuca, Marcello Della Corte, Nicola Gratteri, Giovanni Fossati, Raffaele Raimondi, Luca Pagano, Vincenzo Scorcia, Giuseppe Giannaccare

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfredo BorgiaEye Unit, Humanitas-Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Daniela MazzucaDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University 'Magna Græcia' of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
Marcello Della CorteDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University 'Magna Græcia' of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
Nicola GratteriDepartment of Law, Forensic Medicine and Criminology, University 'Magna Græcia' of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giovanni FossatiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Raffaele RaimondiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Luca PaganoDepartment of Corneal Diseases, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Vincenzo ScorciaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100, Germaneto, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giuseppe GiannaccareDepartment of Ophthalmology, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100, Germaneto, Catanzaro, Italy. giuseppe.giannaccare@unicz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-0289
Magna Graecia University · ITHumanitas University · ITUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review we discuss the role of intraocular surgery preoperative prophylaxis. The correct choice of antimicrobial drug is variable in each surgical setting, according to the available strengths of evidence, the anatomical district involved, and the type of procedure. In the ophthalmic surgical field, there has been a progressive shift from antibiotic formulations, which are known to cause antibiotic resistance, to a new class of antiseptic compounds, which proved to be effective not only against bacteria, but also against fungi, protozoa, and viruses. Among these, povidone-iodine (PVI) is a water-soluble polymer that can form a complex with iodine, and the perioperative application of PVI 5-10% eye drop for 3 min is the gold standard for infection prophylaxis. A new formulation of 0.6% PVI eye drop is a new option for infection prophylaxis in the days before surgery. Chlorhexidine is a biguanide compound, which is a valid alternative with a good safety and efficacy profile and is the antiseptic of choice in patients with iodine allergy. New compounds that are currently being studied include polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), picloxydine, ozone, hypochlorous acid (HOCl), and Biosecur. PHMB is a biguanide polymer that was found to be more effective than PVI in in vitro studies for reducing microorganisms and extending the duration of antisepsis, but to date, there are no formulations available on the market for preoperative ocular surgery in which it is present as main ingredient. Ozone is a molecule with oxidizing effect, which showed interesting preliminary results but is not effective against virus, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. HOCl has a natural bactericidal propriety but its applicability to prophylaxis of ocular infection in the setting of ocular surgery is not established. Biosecur is a non-toxic organic alcohol-free compound that exhibited bactericidal and fungicidal effect versus all common microorganisms and is currently available as an ocular spray.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceAntisepsisDisinfectantEndophthalmitisOcular surgeryPublic healthRisk management

Identifiers

PMID36719608
PMCPMC10011360
OpenAlexW4318671238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.