Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36719540›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2023

Longitudinal medical subspecialty follow-up of critically and non-critically ill hospitalized COVID-19 survivors up to 24 months after discharge.

Benjamin Musheyev, Montek S Boparai, Reona Kimura, Rebeca Janowicz, Stacey Pamlanye, Wei Hou, Tim Q Duong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin MusheyevDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
Montek S BoparaiRenaissance School of Medicine at Stony, Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Reona KimuraRenaissance School of Medicine at Stony, Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Rebeca JanowiczDepartment of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Stacey PamlanyeDepartment of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Wei HouDepartment of Family, Population and Preventative Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Tim Q DuongDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA. Tim.duong@einsteinmed.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-2827
Stony Brook School · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical specialty usage of COVID-19 survivors after hospital discharge is poorly understood. This study investigated medical specialty usage at 1-12 and 13-24 months post-hospital discharge in critically ill and non-critically ill COVID-19 survivors. This retrospective study followed ICU (N = 89) and non-ICU (N = 205) COVID-19 survivors who returned for follow-up within the Stony Brook Health System post-hospital discharge. Follow-up data including survival, hospital readmission, ongoing symptoms, medical specialty care use, and ICU status were examined 1-12 and 13-24 months after COVID-19 discharge. "New" (not previously seen) medical specialty usage was also identified. Essentially all (98%) patients survived. Hospital readmission was 34%, but functional status scores at discharge were not associated with hospital readmission. Many patients reported ongoing [neuromuscular (50%) respiratory (39%), chronic fatigue (35%), cardiovascular (30%), gastrointestinal (28%), neurocognitive (22%), genitourinary (22%), and mood-related (13%)] symptoms at least once 1-24 months after discharge. Common specialty follow-ups included cardiology (25%), vascular medicine (17%), urology (17%), neurology (16%), and pulmonology (14%), with some associated with pre-existing comorbidities and with COVID-19. Common new specialty visits were vascular medicine (11%), pulmonology (11%), and neurology (9%). ICU patients had more symptoms and follow-ups compared to the non-ICU patients. This study reported high incidence of persistent symptoms and medical specialty care needs in hospitalized COVID-19 survivors 1-24 months post-discharge. Some specialty care needs were COVID-19 related or exacerbated by COVID-19 disease while others were associated with pre-existing medical conditions. Longer follow-up studies of COVID-19 survivor medical care needs are necessary.

Indexed as

COVID-19AftercareFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsPatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2SurvivorsCoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19 sequelaLong COVIDPost-acute COVID-19 symptomsPost-acute sequelae of COVID-19SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36719540
PMCPMC9887251
OpenAlexW4318613309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.