ArticleWorld journal of urology2023
Development and internal validation of a prediction model to evaluate the risk of severe hemorrhage following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A novel preoperative risk score for predicting Urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: validation and clinical application.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Major Bleeding in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Study.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a postoperative hypothermia risk model for minimally invasive transurethral surgery under general anesthesia.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Integration of minimally invasive techniques and interventional therapy: application of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with upper urinary tract stones and an analysis of risk factors for postoperative bleeding.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Analysis of factors affecting intraoperative hemorrhage during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and establishment of nomogram model.Urolithiasis · 2024Article
- Analysis of artery injury types and clinical characteristics of patients with transcatheter angioembolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a new prediction model for assessing the severe hemorrhage events in post mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) patients and internally validate it, thus to guide decision making in clinical practice.
methodsThe patients who underwent mini-PCNL were retrospectively reviewed. Potential risk factors were included as prediction variables for multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors, and prediction model was constructed. The predictive ability of the model was evaluated using the Concordance index (C-index) and Brier score. Bootstrapping resampling technique was used to perform internal validation. The related packages in R were used to generate the web application based on the prediction model.
resultsMultiple-tract was the strongest predictor of severe hemorrhage following mini-PCNL. Other risk factors were none or mild hydronephrosis, congenital anomalies of urinary system, urinary tract infection, operation time and stone peak Hounsfield unit. A prediction model was constructed to assess the probability of severe hemorrhage after mini-PCNL. The C-index and Brier score were 0.731 and 0.093, respectively after correcting for optimism, which signified the excellent discrimination and calibration.
conclusionA new prediction model was developed to estimate risk of severe hemorrhage after mini-PCNL. It had been internally validated with good discrimination and calibration. The prediction model might be beneficial for endourologists in surgical decision-making and risk aversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36719464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.