ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2023
Insurance denials and diagnostic rates in a pediatric genomic research cohort.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exome sequencing early in outpatient evaluation in NCGENES 2: Changing the course of the diagnostic odyssey?HGG advances · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted clinical exome sequencing: Insights and outcomes from 822 pediatric diagnoses.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Determining the value of genomics in healthcare.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Precision diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Implementing a specialized cardiogenomics team for lipid disorders: Insights from a single large health system.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Navigating Genetic Testing in Nephrology: Options and Decision-Making Strategies.Kidney international reports · 2025Review
- Insurance denials: a peer-to-peer problem in neonatology.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Article
- Improving access to exome sequencing in a medically underserved population through the Texome Project.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Article
- Genomic Answers for Kids: Toward more equitable access to genomic testing for rare diseases in rural populations.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to assess the amount and types of clinical genetic testing denied by insurance and the rate of diagnostic and candidate genetic findings identified through research in patients who faced insurance denials.
methodsAnalysis consisted of review of insurance denials in 801 patients enrolled in a pediatric genomic research repository with either no previous genetic testing or previous negative genetic testing result identified through cross-referencing with insurance prior-authorizations in patient medical records. Patients and denials were also categorized by type of insurance coverage. Diagnostic findings and candidate genetic findings in these groups were determined through review of our internal variant database and patient charts.
resultsOf the 801 patients analyzed, 147 had insurance prior-authorization denials on record (18.3%). Exome sequencing and microarray were the most frequently denied genetic tests. Private insurance was significantly more likely to deny testing than public insurance (odds ratio = 2.03 [95% CI = 1.38-2.99] P = .0003). Of the 147 patients with insurance denials, 53.7% had at least 1 diagnostic or candidate finding and 10.9% specifically had a clinically diagnostic finding. Fifty percent of patients with clinically diagnostic results had immediate medical management changes (5.4% of all patients experiencing denials).
conclusionMany patients face a major barrier to genetic testing in the form of lack of insurance coverage. A number of these patients have clinically diagnostic findings with medical management implications that would not have been identified without access to research testing. These findings support re-evaluation of insurance carriers' coverage policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.