ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023
Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Nucleotide-Binding Domain Leucine-Rich Repeat Protein 1 with
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Some Factors Influencing the Number ofInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat protein (NLRP) is critical in the inflammasome-activation pathway, which is important for host survival and the clearance of Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study consisted of hospitalized adults was conducted from January 2011 to January 2013. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of NLRP1, including rs12150220, rs2670660, rs6502867, rs878329, rs8182352, rs3744717, and rs11078571, were incorporating in analyses. The episodes of CdC and CDI were the primary and secondary outcome, respectively. Results: Of the total of 509 eligible patients, 376 (73.9%) had neither CdC nor CDI, 104 (21.8%) had CdC without developing CDI, and 29 (4.3%) developed CDI during the study period. Through multivariate analyses, comorbid diabetes mellitus (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.59, Conclusion: For hospitalized adults, the association of CC genotype in NLRP1 rs3744717 and CdC as well as the CC+GC genotype in NLRP1 rs878329 and CDI was respectively evidenced. We believed the prompt identification of patients having specific genotype in NLRP1 would prevent and improve the quality of care in CDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.