Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36718456›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Evidence of validity and reliability of Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 for estimating vertical jump variables.

Amilton Vieira, Gabriela L Ribeiro, Victor Macedo, Valdinar de Araújo Rocha Junior, Roberto de Souza Baptista, Carlos Gonçalves, Rafael Cunha, James Tufano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amilton VieiraStrength and Conditioning Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Gabriela L RibeiroStrength and Conditioning Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Victor MacedoStrength and Conditioning Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Valdinar de Araújo Rocha JuniorStrength and Conditioning Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Roberto de Souza BaptistaAutomation and Robotics Laboratory, Faculty of Technology, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Carlos GonçalvesStrength and Conditioning Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Rafael CunhaStrength and Conditioning Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
James TufanoFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We investigated the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 apps for estimating jump height, and the mean values of force, velocity, and power produced during countermovement (CMJ) and squat jumps (SJ). Methods: Physically active university aged men ( Results: Both apps provided a reliable estimate of jump height and the mean values of force, velocity, and power. Furthermore, estimates of jump height for CMJ and SJ and the mean force of the CMJ were valid. However, the apps presented impractical or poor validity correlations for velocity and power. Compared with criterion, the apps underestimated the velocity of the CMJ. Conclusions: Therefore, Jumpo 2 and MyJump 2 both provide a valid measure of jump height, but the remaining variables provided by these apps must be viewed with caution since the validity of force depends on jump type, while velocity (and as consequence power) could not be well estimated from the apps.

Indexed as

PostureSmartphoneAgedHumansMaleMotionReproducibility of ResultsVideotape RecordingCountermovement jumpForcePowerSquat jumpVelocity

Identifiers

PMID36718456
PMCPMC9884043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.