ArticlePeerJ2023
Comparison of urine proteomes from tumor-bearing mice with those from tumor-resected mice.
Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Practical, Noninvasive Urine Collection Method for Mice for Large Cohort Preclinical Studies.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to address on the most important concern of surgeons-whether to completely resect tumor. Urine can indicate early changes associated with physiological or pathophysiological processes. Based on these ideas, we conducted experiments to explore changes in the urine proteome between tumor-bearing mice and tumor-resected mice. Method: The tumor-bearing mouse model was established with MC38 mouse colon cancer cells, and the mice were divided into the control group, tumor-resected group, and tumor-bearing group. Urine was collected 7 and 30 days after tumor resection. Liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to identify the urine proteome, which was analyzed for differentially expressed proteins and functional annotation. Results: (1) Seven days after tumor resection, 20 differentially expressed proteins distinguished the tumor-resected group and the tumor-bearing group. The identified biological processes included circadian rhythm, Notch signaling pathway, leukocyte cell-cell adhesion, and heterophilic cell-cell adhesion Conclusion: Changes in the urinary proteome can reflect the complete resection of MC38 tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.