ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2023
Minimally invasive corneal neurotization for neurotrophic keratopathy: The potential effect of age, denervation chronicity and lesion location.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defining Criteria for Choosing Corneal Neurotization in Neurotrophic Keratopathy: A Systematic Review Along with Practical Advices.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is an uncommon but challenging clinical condition characterized by altered corneal nerves and sensation leading to corneal damage. Corneal neurotization, a surgical technique that aims to "re-innervate" the cornea, has gained increasing popularity in view of the potential to permanently improve or even restore the normal corneal sensation. In this study, we aimed to report the outcomes of two cases of NK that underwent indirect minimally invasive corneal neurotization (MICN) with a sural nerve autograft, and to provide plausible explanations for the observed clinical outcomes. Observations: This was an interventional case series of two patients who underwent MICN for severe unilateral NK. The MICN technique was adapted from the technique originally described by Elbaz et al., in 2014. Clinical severity of NK was graded according to Mackie's grading system. Corneal sensation was measured using the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer (0-60mm) and corneal nerves were examined using Conclusions and Importance: Based on our observations and the literature, we postulate that long denervation time, proximal injury to the trigeminal nerve and older patient age may serve as poor prognostic factors for MICN. As CN is being increasingly adopted in clinical practice for treating NK, understanding of these potential factors will facilitate better risk-benefit stratification and patient counselling. Future larger studies are required to elucidate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.