ArticleJournal of applied physics2023
A new method to measure magnetic nanoparticle heating efficiency in non-adiabatic systems using transient pulse analysis.
Article in Journal of applied physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, verification and validation of a spatially confined magnetic nanoparticle thermal therapy device for conformal thermal dose contouring.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2026Article
- Modified tumor uptake and biodistribution of nanoparticles coated with small extracellular vesicle membranes derived from distinct tumor cell lines.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2026Article
- Synergistic photothermal and magnetothermal heat generation with Sc-doped iron oxide nanoflakes: a platform for potential bimodal tumor therapy.Nano convergence · 2026Article
- Verification and Validation of an Autotuning Proportional-Integral-Derivative Controller for Spatially Confined Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia.Journal of medical devices · 2026Article
- Automated laser retraction for targeted glioblastoma coverage during laser interstitial thermal therapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Magnetic Anisotropy Dominates over Physical and Magnetic Structure in Performance of Magnetic Nanoflowers.Small structures · 2025Article
- Ranking Magnetic Colloid Performance for Magnetic Particle Imaging and Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia.Advanced functional materials · 2025Article
- Magnetic particle imaging resolution needed for magnetic hyperthermia treatment planning: a sensitivity analysis.Frontiers in thermal engineering · 2025Article
- Beyond Newton's law of cooling in evaluating magnetic hyperthermia performance: a device-independent procedure.Nanoscale advances · 2024Article
- Magnetic Particle Imaging-Guided Thermal Simulations for Magnetic Particle Hyperthermia.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development of a Treatment Planning Framework for Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT).Cancers · 2023Article
- MONITORING PERFUSION-BASED CONVECTION IN CANCER TUMOR TISSUE UNDERGOING NANOPARTICLE HEATING BY ANALYZING TEMPERATURE RESPONSES TO TRANSIENT PULSED HEATING.Proceedings of the ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference. ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference · 2023Article
- HYPER: pre-clinical device for spatially-confined magnetic particle hyperthermia.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heating magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) with alternating magnetic fields (AMFs) have applications in biomedical research and cancer therapy. Accurate measurement of the heating efficiency or specific loss power (SLP) generated by the MNPs is essential to assess response(s) in biological systems. Efforts to develop standardized equipment and to harmonize results obtained from various MNP samples and AMF systems have met with little success. Without a standardized magnetic nanoparticle or calorimeter device, objective comparisons of estimated thermal output among laboratories remain a challenge. In addition, the most widely used adiabatic initial slope model fails to account for thermal losses, which are unavoidable. We propose a non-adiabatic method to analyze MNP heating efficiency derived from the Box-Lucas equation, wherein the sample is subjected to several short duration heating pulses. SLP is then estimated from an arithmetic average of the Box-Lucas fitted coefficients obtained from each pulse. Heating experiments were conducted with two identical samples that were placed within vessels having different thermal insulation using the same AMF parameters. Though the samples generated different temperature curves, the pulsed Box-Lucas method produced nearly equivalent SLP estimates. Further, the pulsed test enabled analysis of the heat transfer coefficient providing quantitative measures of sample heat loss throughout the test, with robust statistical confidence. We anticipate this new methodology will aid efforts to standardize measurements of MNP heating efficiency, enabling direct comparison among varied systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.