Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36718184›Full record

ArticleJournal of international development2022

Development from a distance: Exploring an international non-profit's interactions with communities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ashley Peiffer, Michael Harte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of international development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashley PeifferCollege of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.
Michael HarteCollege of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8571-9481

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A case study analysis of an international development non-profit identifies strategies and decision-making processes utilized to engage community members in person and virtually during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The strategies employed led to a continuation of projects in the field, potentially excluding some stakeholder groups from decision-making processes at the community level. Staff members described how power dynamics and geographic distance affected internal decision-making for community involvement, highlighting the importance of adopting a critical self-reflection approach to facilitate communication among an intercultural team for more equitable community engagement.

Indexed as

COVID‐19critical self‐reflectionEast Africafisheries co‐managementinternational developmentnon‐profit

Identifiers

PMID36718184
PMCPMC9877710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.