Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36718161›Full record

ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2022

Efficacy of a 0.5% Propolis -0.9% Pomegranate Buccal Spray Treatment Compared with 2% Miconazole Gel for Denture Stomatitis Treatment in Elderly Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yêda Maria Parro, Danielly de Mendonça Guimarães, Herick Sampaio Muller, Eduardo Barbosa Coelho, Andresa Aparecida Berretta, Jessica Aparecida de Lima, David De Jong, Vicen-Te de Paulo Martins, Erica Negrini Lia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yêda Maria ParroTropical Medicine Postgraduate Program, School of Medicine, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Danielly de Mendonça GuimarãesDental Student, Dept. of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Herick Sampaio MullerMolecular Biology Postgraduate Program, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Eduardo Barbosa CoelhoDept. of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Andresa Aparecida BerrettaApis Flora Industrial e Comercial Ltda, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Jessica Aparecida de LimaApis Flora Industrial e Comercial Ltda, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
David De JongGenetics Department, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Vicen-Te de Paulo MartinsInstitute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Erica Negrini LiaDept. of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, DF, Brazil.
Apis Flora (Brazil) · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Natural products have attracted interest as an alternative to synthetic medi-cations for the treatment of oral diseases due to their efficacy and safety. Propolis and pomegranate extracts have both demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of denture stomatitis. However, use of the two compounds together has not been tested for this purpose. Purpose: A comparison was made of the efficacy of a commercially available propolis-pomegranate buccal spray formulation for the treatment of denture stomatitis, compared with miconazole gel, based on stomatitis lesions and Materials and Method: This was an experimental study, characterized as an open-label, parallel two-armed, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. Forty elderly adults aged < 60 years with denture stoma-titis were randomly allocated to two groups. The patients applied a buccal spray containing 0.5% propo-lis and 0.9% pomegranate extracts or 2% miconazole gel, a standard treatment recommended in Brazil, to the inner surface of their dentures three times a day for 14 days. They were examined at days 1, 7, 14 and stomatitis lesions were categorized according to Newton's score. Mouth rinses were made with saline solution at days 1 and 14 and then assessed for Results: Both treatments reduced the Newton's score, with clinical cure rates of 75 and 40% for the miconazole and propolis-pomegranate groups, respectively. The Conclusion: The propolis-pomegranate spray was less effective than the miconazole treatment. Howev-er, clinical improvement was also observed in patients treated with the propolis-pomegranate buccal spray.

Indexed as

Clinical trialDenture stomatitisLythraceaePropolis

Identifiers

PMID36718161
PMCPMC9883633
OpenAlexW4318668296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.