Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717863›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Changes in the characteristics of patients treated for brain metastases with repeat stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT): a retrospective study of 184 patients.

L Kuntz, C Le Fèvre, D Jarnet, A Keller, P Meyer, A Thiery, H Cebula, G Noel, D Antoni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcomes in long-term survivors treated with stereotactic cranial radiotherapy for brain metastases.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L KuntzDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France. l.kuntz@icans.eu.
C Le FèvreDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
D JarnetMedical Physics Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
A KellerDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
P MeyerMedical Physics Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
A ThieryMedical Information Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 3 Rue de La Porte de L'Hôpital, 67065, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
H CebulaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
G NoelDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France. g.noel@icans.eu.
D AntoniDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBrain metastases (BMs) are the leading cause of intracranial malignant neoplasms in adults. WHO, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), age, number of BMs, extracerebral progression (ECP), recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (Ds-GPA) are validated prognostic tools to help clinicians decide on treatment. No consensus exists for repeat stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for BMs. The aim of this study was to review the changes in patient characteristics treated with repeated SRTs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data of patients treated between 2010 and 2020 with at least two courses of SRT without previous whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were reviewed. Age, WHO, KPS, ECP, type of systemic treatment, number of BMs were recorded. RPA, Ds-GPA and brain metastasis velocity (BMV) were calculated.

results184 patients were treated for 915 BMs and received two to six SRTs for local or distant brain recurrence. The median number of BMs treated per SRT was 1 (range: 1-6), for a median of 4 BMs treated during all sessions (range: 2-19). WHO, Ds-GPA and RPA were stable between each session of SRT, whereas KPS was significantly better in SRT1 than in the following SRT. The number of BMs was not significantly different between each SRT, but there was a tendency for more BM at SRT1 (p = 0.06). At SRT1, patients had largest BM and undergo more surgery than during the following SRT (p < 0.001). 6.5%, 37.5% and 56% of patients were classified as high, intermediate, and low BMV, respectively, at the last SRT session. There was almost perfect concordance between the BMV-grade calculated at the last SRT session and at SRT2 (r = 0.89; p < 0.001).

conclusionRepeated SRT doesn't lead to a marked alteration in the general condition, KPS was maintained at over 70% for more than 95% of patients during all SRTs. Long survival can be expected, especially in low-grade BMV patients. WBRT shouldn't be aborted, especially for patients developing more than twelve BMs annually.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAdultBrainCranial IrradiationHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBrain metastasesOligorecurrenceRadiotherapyReirradiationRepeated radiosurgerySalvage radiationStereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID36717863
PMCPMC9885681
OpenAlexW4318475314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.