Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36717845›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2023

In vitro co-culture systems of hepatic and intestinal cells for cellular pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of capecitabine against colorectal cancer.

Chun Ge, Xintong Huang, Sujie Zhang, Man Yuan, Zhaoyi Tan, Chen Xu, Qiong Jie, Jingjing Zhang, Jianjun Zou, Yubing Zhu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Novel emerging cell and organoid systems for the study of drug metabolism and toxicity in humans.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025
    Review
  8. Roles of Wnt ligands and receptors in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chun Ge *Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Xintong Huang *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Basic Medicine & Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Sujie Zhang *Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Basic Medicine & Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Man YuanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Basic Medicine & Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Zhaoyi TanKey Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Chen XuKey Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Qiong JieDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Jingjing ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Jianjun ZouDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China.
Yubing ZhuDepartment of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China. 5720190002@cpu.edu.cn.
Dong FengNanjing Southern Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, 211100, China. wdljsyx86128@126.com.
Yue ZhangKey Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China. 1520200017@cpu.edu.cn.
Jiye AaKey Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
China Pharmaceutical University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNState Key Laboratory of Natural Medicine

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2018M640498Jiangsu postdoctoral grant program 2018Z092Nanjing Science and Technology Development Foundation 202205029National Natural Science Foundation of China 81803622National Natural Science Foundation of China 81803624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), orally administrated capecitabine (CAP) undergoes preliminary conversion into active metabolites in the liver and then releases 5-FU in the gut to exert the anti-tumor activity. Since metabolic changes of CAP play a key role in its activation, a single kind of intestinal or hepatic cell can never be used in vitro to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) nature. Hence, we aimed to establish a novel in vitro system to effectively assess the PK and PD of these kinds of prodrugs.

methodsCo-culture cellular models were established by simultaneously using colorectal cancer (CRC) and hepatocarcinoma cell lines in one system. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and flow cytometric analysis were used to evaluate cell viability and apoptosis, respectively. Apoptosis-related protein expression levels were measured using western blot analysis. A selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for cellular PK in co-culture models.

resultsCAP had little anti-proliferative effect on the five monolayer CRC cell lines (SW480, LoVo, HCT-8, HCT-116 and SW620) or the hepatocarcinoma cell line (HepG2). However, CAP exerted marked anti-tumor activities on each of the CRC cell lines in the co-culture models containing both CRC and hepatocarcinoma cell lines, although its effect on the five CRC cell lines varied. Moreover, after pre-incubation of CAP with HepG2 cells, the culture media containing the active metabolites of CAP also showed an anti-tumor effect on the five CRC cell lines, indicating the crucial role of hepatic cells in the activation of CAP.

conclusionThe simple and cost‑effective co-culture models with both CRC and hepatocarcinoma cells could mimic the in vivo process of a prodrug dependent on metabolic conversion to active metabolites in the liver, providing a valuable strategy for evaluating the PK and PD characteristics of CAP-like prodrugs in vitro at the early stage of drug development.

Indexed as

CapecitabineCellular pharmacodynamicsCellular pharmacokineticsCo-cultureProdrug

Identifiers

PMID36717845
PMCPMC9887786
OpenAlexW4318563932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.